Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Utah
Criminal Defense Attorney Stephen Howard
Call Criminal Defense Attorney in Utah
Call Utah Criminal Lawyer
Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyers / Former Prosecutors
Call 801-449-1409 now to see what the right attorney can do for you.
Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer Salt Lake City

Criminal Defense Solutions Start HereSM

Finding a Felony Defense LawyerChoosing a Misdemeanor Defense LawyerDrug and Alcohol Crimes Defense LawyerWhite Collar Defense Attorney for Utah ChargesAttorney for Expungements Reductions and PardonsDefendant Constitutional Rights Criminal LawyerBail and Bond Alternatives in UtahReasons for Hope Facing Criminal Charges

Utah Criminal Defense Attorney Salt Lake City

On October 28, 2015, the Utah Supreme Court announced the promulgation of a new evidentiary rule, governing the admissibility of statements made during custodial interrogations in Utah felony cases. The rule places significant restrictions on the use of such statements, unless police make a recording of the statement available to defense counsel and at trial. The rule takes effect January 1, 2016.

If you are facing criminal prosecution in Utah, the assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney is critical. Contact us today to arrange for an initial confidential consultation with Utah criminal lawyer Stephen Howard.

Utah Rules of Evidence - Rule 616 - Admissibility of Statements Made in Custodial Interrogations

The new Rule 616 of the Utah Rules of Evidence provides generally that in felony prosecutions, a statement made by a criminal defendant during a custodial interrogation that occurs in a "place of detention" is not admissible against the defendant unless an electronic recording of the statement was created and is made available at trial. Subsection (b) of the rule makes it clear that this rule "is in addition to" and is not intended to diminish any other requirements of a defendant's admissions or statements. The "other requirements" referred to should be interpreted as including other rules of evidence as well as Fifth Amendment constitutional protections as interpreted by case law, including the United States Supreme Court decision in Miranda and its progeny.

The rule states, "Except as otherwise provided in Subsection (c) of this rule, evidence of a statement made by the defendant during a custodial interrogation in a place of detention shall not be admitted against the defendant in a felony criminal prosecution unless an electronic recording of the statement was made and is available at trial. This requirement is in addition to, and does not diminish, any other requirement regarding the admissibility of a person’s statements."

While Rule 616 appears to create a broad prohibition on the use of unrecorded statements made during custodial interrogations, the rule also provides a number of exceptions that severely limit the effect of the rule. These exceptions include:
  • Statements that were made prior to January 1, 2016;
  • Statements that were made during a custodial interrogation that occurred outside Utah and was conducted by officers of a jurisdiction outside Utah;
  • Statements that are is offered for impeachment purposes only;
  • Statements that were spontaneously made outside the course of a custodial interrogation or made during routine processing or booking of the person;
  • Statements made when, before or during a custodial interrogation, the person agreed to respond to questions only if his or her statements were not electronically recorded, provided that such agreement is electronically recorded or documented in writing;
  • Statements made when the law enforcement officers conducting the custodial interrogation in good faith failed to make an electronic recording because the officers inadvertently failed to operate the recording equipment properly, or without the knowledge of any of the officers the recording equipment malfunctioned or stopped operating;
  • Statements made when the law enforcement officers conducting or observing the custodial interrogation reasonably believed that the crime for which the person was being investigated was not a felony under Utah law;
  • Statements made when substantial exigent circumstances existed that prevented or rendered unfeasible the making of an electronic recording of the custodial interrogation, or prevented its preservation and availability at trial;
Rule 616 further provides that the court may allow unrecorded statements to be used at trial if the court finds: first, that the statement has "substantial guarantees of trustworthiness and reliability equivalent to those of an electronic recording;" and, second, that "admitting the statement best serves the purposes of [the rules of evidence] and the interests of justice."

This final exception is potentially broad enough to eclipse the general rule that unrecorded statements should be excluded. The rule does not define or otherwise explain what kinds of guarantees of trustworthiness and reliability are "equivalent to those of an electronic recording." The rule also gives no guidance as to how to determine when the admission of an unrecorded statement "best serves . . . the interests of justice."

The apparent purpose of this rule appears to be to reduce uncertainty relating to the reliability of alleged confessions in criminal cases. But the way that courts decide to interpret this rule could greatly limit its ultimate effect in the criminal justice system.

Finding a Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer

Salt Lake Criminal Defense LawyerWhether you are facing felony charges or misdemeanor prosecution, the consequences of conviction can be serious. Having the assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney can make all the difference. Contact us today to arrange for an initial confidential consultation with Utah criminal lawyer Stephen Howard.

Contact us today to arrange for an initial confidential consultation.

Best Rating
Make a Payment to Your Account
Get Help Now
Name: Email: Phone: Describe your legal needs here:
I accept the disclaimer below.
Disclaimer: No attorney-client relationship is established by the use of this form. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be submitted through this form. By clicking 'submit' I am only requesting that I be contacted for the purpose of obtaining legal services.

This form protected by reCAPTCHA.

  • Selected Victories
  • Criminal Defense AttorneyDismissed - Charges of insurance fraud were brought when investigators found reason to believe that client's claim of injury was fraudulent. Client was seen kicking a soccer ball, and investigators concluded that the injury claim was false. By obtaining medical records and other administrative records, and by pointing out to the prosecutor that the alleged injury interferred with the client's ability to lift - not his ability to kick a ball - the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the case.
  • Minor Possession Alcohol - MIP AttorneyDismissed - Minor in possession charge (MIP) was dismissed by prosecutor when defense analysis demonstrated that the police had failed to obtain necessary evidence against client. Police had raided a large party involving underage drinking. Several individuals were charged, but police did not obtain evidence showing that client had personally consumed or possessed alcohol. Case was dismissed.
  • Utah 402 Reduction Attorney Felony Reduced - Client with prior felony conviction was granted a 402 reduction to the misdemeanor level over the objection of the prosecutor. Based on information provided to the court in support of the defense motion, the judge ruled in favor of the defense.
  • Utah Burglary Attorney Dismissal - Client was charged with first-degree felony home burglary and facing potential life in prison. Defense analysis revealed flaws in prosecutor's case which led to abeyance agreement intended to lead to a full dismissal of the case.
  • Recent Posts
  • What Constitutes Drug Parpahernalia in Utah How is drug paraphernalia defined in Utah? - The definition of drug paraphernalia under the Utah criminal code looks at both the nature of the object and also the intended use of the object in question. . . .
  • Utah Misdemeanor Attorney Salt Lake Can I handle a Utah misdemeanor from out-of-state? - Even if you do not intend to take your case to trial, a misdemeanor criminal offense in Utah can require multiple court appearances to reach a resolution. If you have been charged with a crime in Utah, but are not a Utah resident, an experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to help you resolve the case without returning to the state. . . .
Best Criminal Defense Strategy

Aggressive is good. Effective is better. The best defense strategy in any given criminal case can require in-depth analysis of the facts and a thorough understanding of applicable statutes, case law, and complex procedural and evidentiary rules. Having an experienced attorney on your side....

Strategy »
Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Profile Utah

Choosing the best criminal defense attorney for your Utah criminal case may be the single most important decision you make. The courtroom can be a hostile place. Prosecutors receive extensive training on legal and tactical issues. Having an experienced criminal defense lawyer on your side is critical to defending your case and protecting your rights....

Experience »
Conviction Consequences - Utah Criminal Defense

In Utah, even a "minor" misdemeanor conviction carries the potential for jail time and significant fines. A felony conviction carries the potential of lengthy prison terms and the various consequences that come with being labeled as a convicted felon. Never plead guilty without first finding out....

Consequences »
Utah Criminal Defense Attorney - Hope

Facing criminal prosecution in Utah can feel like your world is collapsing. But there are reasons to remain hopeful, and there are things you can do right now that can help increase the odds of a successful outcome. An experienced criminal defense attorney can help you evaluate the various options you have, and can help you....

Reasons to Hope »
Home | Attorney Profile | Case Results | Criminal Code | FAQ | Legal Resources | Defense Strategy | Contact Us

Serving Salt Lake, Davis, Weber, Utah, Cache, Tooele, Summit, Box Elder, and Wasatch Counties, and all of Utah.

Attorney Stephen Howard practices as part of the Canyons Law Group, LLC and Stephen W. Howard, PC.

Offices in Salt Lake and Davis Counties
560 South 300 East, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
952 S. Main St., Suite A, Layton, UT 84041

Call now to arrange for a confidential initial consultation with an experienced and effective Utah criminal defense lawyer.

In Salt Lake City, call 801-449-1409.
In Davis County, call 801-923-4345.

Stephen W. Howard, PC

The materials in this website are intended for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Viewing or responding to materials in this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Read Full Disclaimer.