Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Utah
Call Criminal Defense Attorney in Utah
Call Utah Criminal Lawyer
Take the first step in securing a successful defense.
Call 801-449-1409 now to see what our team can do for you.
Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer Salt Lake City

Criminal Defense Solutions Start HereSM

Finding a Felony Defense LawyerChoosing a Misdemeanor Defense LawyerDrug and Alcohol Crimes Defense LawyerWhite Collar Defense Attorney for Utah ChargesAttorney for Expungements Reductions and PardonsDefendant Constitutional Rights Criminal LawyerBail and Bond Alternatives in UtahReasons for Hope Facing Criminal Charges

Utah Fourth Amendment Issues - Davis County

Can I be pulled over by police for going UNDER the speed limit in Davis County?

It is common for police to stop a driver for going faster than the posted speed limit. But there are circumstances where Utah law does allow an officer to pull you over for driving more slowly than the posted limit. This is rare. But if you have been arrested based on information and evidence obtained by police after you were stopped for driving too slowly, you should consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney.

Utah criminal lawyer Stephen Howard provides legal services to clients in Davis County and throughout Utah. He has handled thousands of serious felony and misdemeanor cases for clients during his career. Contact us today to see how we can help you.

What is the basis for a police stop when the driver is going under the speed limit?

Driving under the speed limit is not, by itself, a crime. In theory, the posted speed limit serves as prima facie evidence of the maximum safe speed at which a driver may operate a motor vehicle on a given road. Going more slowly than that maximum safe speed is not, by itself, a crime.

In order to justify pulling a driver over for going too slowly, a police officer must be able to articulate a set of facts that give rise to a reasonable suspicion of some crime. Driving so slowly that you are impeding the normal flow of traffic can form the basis for a traffic citation. But if slow speed by itself is not impeding traffic, a police officer may still be able to articulate grounds sufficient to justify stopping a slow driver.

Absent some specific traffic violation, a police officer must be able to connect the slow driving to a reasonable suspicion of some other crime. For example, if police have received reports that occupants of a white sedan (make and model unknown) are breaking into vehicles late at night in a specific neighborhood, and an officer observes a white Honda Accord driving slowly passed other parked cars while a passenger peers out the window into the parked car, a police officer could argue that these facts supported a reasonable suspicion that the occupants of this vehicle may be involved in the vehicle burglaries.

Does it matter whether the police officer's suspicion turns out to be false?

In order to support a stop of a vehicle under a Fourth Amendment analysis, police do not have to prove that their suspicion was accurate. Instead, police only have to demonstrate that the observed facts could reasonably support their suspicion that criminal activity was occurring or was about to occur.

In the example above, it is possible that the occupants of the white Honda were engaging in lawful activities and that the individuals who were breaking into vehicles were actually driving a white Toyota Camry. The mere fact that the police officer's suspicion turned out to be wrong does not necessarily invalidate any stop, search, or seizure. The courts look at whether the officer's actions were reasonable at the time of inception, even if the suspicion turned out to be wrong.

What limits are on the police officer after I am pulled over?

Any traffic stop made by police must be limited in both scope and time. The limits that are placed on a police officer will initially depend on the reason for which you were pulled over. But those limits may be expanded depending on what other information or evidence the officer discovers (and how it is discovered) following the initial stop.

When making a basic traffic stop, police are generally limited to requesting driver and vehicle information. If all appears to be in order, the police should promptly issue a citation and should generally send the driver on his or her way. Unless an extension in scope is justified on some other factual grounds, a police officer should not ask investigative questions not directly related to the initial purpose of the traffic stop, nor should the officer engage in conduct intended to extend the duration of the stop.

If the officer has stopped a vehicle based on a reasonable suspicion that the occupants of the vehicle are involved in other criminal activity, the scope of the officer's conduct should be limited to what is reasonably necessary to either confirm or dispel the suspicion.|

For example, if police had received a report that two tall, bald men with facial tattoos were driving a white sedan and breaking into cars, but when the police pulled over the white Honda they found two short females with long hair, it would be hard to justify further detention for investigatory purposes. On the other hand, if the white Honda was occupied by two tall, bald men with facial tattoos, the officer would likely be justified in asking these individuals a few questions to determine whether they had been involved in the vehicle burglaries. If, upon stopping the white Honda and finding suspects matching the two men described by witnesses, the officer also observed in plain view in the back seat items that matched the descriptions of the property reportedly stolen in the other vehicle burglaries, the initial investigatory stop could quickly turn into an arrest.

What happens if a police officer exceeds the limits on scope or duration?

Evidence obtained by police in violation of the Fourth Amendment may be subject to a motion to suppress. If such a motion is successful, a court may order that any such evidence be suppressed or excluded at trial. In some instances, suppression of evidence may result in a complete dismissal of the criminal case. In other situations, a prosecutor may still have other evidence sufficient to support the charges.

Finding a Criminal Defense Attorney in Davis County

Criminal Defense Lawyer UtahWhether you are facing misdemeanor or felony charges, having an experienced criminal defense attorney on your side can be critical. Serving clients in Davis County and throughout Utah, criminal defense lawyer Stephen Howard has defended clients in thousands of serious felony and misdemeanor cases in Utah. His record of success includes some of the most serious criminal charges on the books in Utah.

Contact us today to see how we can help you.


Best Rating
Make a Payment to Your Account
Get Help Now
Name: Email: Phone: Describe your legal needs here:
I accept the disclaimer below.
Disclaimer: No attorney-client relationship is established by the use of this form. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be submitted through this form. By clicking 'submit' I am only requesting that I be contacted for the purpose of obtaining legal services.

This form protected by reCAPTCHA.

  • Selected Victories
  • Criminal Defense AttorneyDismissed - Charges of insurance fraud were brought when investigators found reason to believe that client's claim of injury was fraudulent. Client was seen kicking a soccer ball, and investigators concluded that the injury claim was false. By obtaining medical records and other administrative records, and by pointing out to the prosecutor that the alleged injury interferred with the client's ability to lift - not his ability to kick a ball - the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the case.
  • Drug Crimes Defense Attorney Utah Dismissed - Client was facing multiple cases involving first-degree felony drug distribution charges for allegedly selling to a confidential informant. Defense analysis of the case revealed fatal flaws in the prosecution case that ultimately resulted in a complete dismissal of all cases and charges.
  • 402 Reduction Lawyer Utah 2-Step Reduction - Client needed a two-step reduction to bring a prior conviction to the misdemeanor level. Collection of substantial evidence of reform and rehabilitation convinced a normally reluctant prosecutor to stipulate to the defense 402 reduction motion.
  • Violent Crimes Assalt Defense UtahDismissed at Preliminary Hearing - Client charged with aggravated robbery and facing life in prison. Full case analysis and consultation with client allowed the development of a strong defense strategy. Effective cross-examination of the alleged victim at the preliminary hearing resulted in an outright dismissal of all charges by the judge.
Best Criminal Defense Strategy

You want the best defense. Agressive is good. But results ultimately are what really matter. Creating an effective strategy for defending against criminal prosecution requires a thorough understanding of statutes, case law, and evidentiary and procedural rules. A successful outcome is more likely when....

Strategy »
Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Profile Utah

Finding the right criminal defense lawyer for you Utah criminal case will be one of the most important decision you make. Before hiring any lawyer, there are a number of important factors to consider. The person you select as your criminal defense attorney will be responsible to defend your case and protect your rights....

Experience »
Conviction Consequences in Utah Criminal Prosecutions

Jail time, prison time, thousands of dollars in fines, and the lifetime collateral consequences of having a criminal conviction on your record - all of these and more are at stake when you are facing criminal prosecution in Utah. Understanding what is at risk is critical. Even so-called "minor" misdemeanor cases can have serious consequences....

Consequences »
Utah Criminal Defense Attorney - Reasons to Hope

Never give up hope. Being charged with a crime is not the same as being convicted. And it is usually not the end of the world. While the consequences of a criminal charge can be serious, there are often several options and strategies for handling your case. Understanding your options and how an experienced criminal lawyer can help....

Reasons to Hope »
Home | Attorney Profile | Case Results | Criminal Code | FAQ | Legal Resources | Defense Strategy | Contact Us

Serving Salt Lake, Davis, Weber, Utah, Cache, Tooele, Summit, Box Elder, and Wasatch Counties, and all of Utah.

Attorney Stephen Howard practices as part of the Canyons Law Group, LLC and Stephen W. Howard, PC.

Offices in Salt Lake and Davis Counties
560 South 300 East, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
952 S. Main St., Suite A, Layton, UT 84041

Call now to arrange for a confidential initial consultation with an experienced and effective Utah criminal defense lawyer.

In Salt Lake City, call 801-449-1409.
In Davis County, call 801-923-4345.

Stephen W. Howard, PC

The materials in this website are intended for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Viewing or responding to materials in this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Read Full Disclaimer.