Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Utah
Criminal Defense Attorney Stephen Howard
Call Criminal Defense Attorney in Utah
Call Utah Criminal Lawyer
Experienced Criminal Defense Attorneys / Former Prosecutors
Call 801-449-1409. We fight to protect your rights.
Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer Salt Lake City

Criminal Defense Solutions Start HereSM

Finding a Felony Defense LawyerChoosing a Misdemeanor Defense LawyerDrug and Alcohol Crimes Defense LawyerWhite Collar Defense Attorney for Utah ChargesAttorney for Expungements Reductions and PardonsDefendant Constitutional Rights Criminal LawyerBail and Bond Alternatives in UtahReasons for Hope Facing Criminal Charges

Utah Criminal Defense Attorney - Polygraphs

A federal district court issued an opinion in April, 2015 in the case of United States v. Jesus Hernado Angulo-Mosquera, holding that the results of a polygraph examination administered to the defendant by a former FBI special agent would be admitted at trial. This case runs contrary to the position held by many (or most) Utah judges and attorneys that polygraph examination results are generally not admissible in court.

Polygraph examination can play an important role in the investigation, prosecution, and defense of criminal cases. If you are facing criminal prosecution in Utah or have been asked to take a polygraph exam by a police investigator or detective, it is important to first seek the advice of an experienced criminal defense attorney. Contact us today to arrange for an initial confidential consultation.

Admissibility of Polygraph Exam Results in Utah Criminal Cases

The Utah Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of polygraph examination results in the case of State v. Crosby, 927 P.2d 638 (Utah 1996). Specifically, the court addressed the question of whether polygraph examination at that time was sufficiently reliable to meet the standards set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmeceuticals or by the Utah Supreme Court in State v. Rimmasch.

The Utah Supreme Court in Crosby upheld the trial court's decision to exclude evidence of the polygraph exam results. But the court also held open the possibility of reexamining the issue in the future. To succeed, the court stated the proponent polygraph evidence would have to "make a detailed foundational showing, specifically demonstrating how research or recent developments in the field have made polygraph evidence more reliable."

In the federal case of United States v. Angulo-Mosquera, the defense presented evidence and testimony to suggest that the science behind polygraph examination had developed to the point that it should be admitted. The defense polygraph expert testified that polygraph theories, methods, and techniques can and have been tested; that the known or potential error rate of polygraph techniques is within an acceptable range; that the techniques have been subject to peer review; and that the techniques have been generally accepted in relevant scientific community (read as "police use them and polygraphers say they work").

The court's opinion notes, "The Government did not present any evidence or testimony at the hearing to contradict [the defense expert's] testimony." It seems that in some ways, the defense may have caught the prosecution asleep at the wheel and that the defense win may have been a win more as a matter of default than as a matter of substance. The fact that the prosecution failed to present any evidence to contradict the defense expert leaves unanswered the question of how the court might have ruled if the prosecution had brought in their own expert to testify that polygraphs are junk science.

The Nagulo-Mosquera case is not a Utah case nor is it an appellate court decision. And so it carries no binding precedential value in the Utah court system. Further, since the case originates in the 11th Circuit and is consistent with prior 11th Circuit appellate jurisprudence, it is unclear just what impact this trial court decision will have on the use of polygraph evidence in the future.

Use of Polygraph Examination in Utah Criminal Cases

Although the admission of evidence relating to polygraph examination results has not been generally approved by Utah courts, polygraph examination is often used by police as an investigative tool. From a criminal defense perspective, polygraph examination can sometimes be used as a tool to convince prosecutors to dismiss or decline filing criminal charges altogether. Particularly in cases where the evidence is questionable, a defendant's positive (truthful) polygraph result can be helpful outside formal courtroom proceedings.

Finding a Utah Criminal Defense Attorney

Utah Criminal Defense LawyerIf you are facing criminal prosecution, or if a police investigator or detective has requested that you take a polygraph exam, there are important constitutional protections that you must understand. The assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney is critical.

Contact us today to arrange for a confidential consultation.

Best Rating
Make a Payment to Your Account
Get Help Now
Name: Email: Phone: Describe your legal needs here:
I accept the disclaimer below.
Disclaimer: No attorney-client relationship is established by the use of this form. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be submitted through this form. By clicking 'submit' I am only requesting that I be contacted for the purpose of obtaining legal services.

This form protected by reCAPTCHA.

  • Selected Victories
  • Criminal Defense Trial AttorneyNot Guilty - Client was charged with aggravated assault for allegedly pointing handgun at and threatening another driver during a road rage incident. Defense investigation and analysis, combined with effective cross-examination at trial indicated the alleged victim was the initial aggressor and suported client's self-defense claim. Jury acquitted client at trial.
  • Minor Possession Alcohol - MIP AttorneyDismissed - Minor in possession charge (MIP) was dismissed by prosecutor when defense analysis demonstrated that the police had failed to obtain necessary evidence against client. Police had raided a large party involving underage drinking. Several individuals were charged, but police did not obtain evidence showing that client had personally consumed or possessed alcohol. Case was dismissed.
  • Utah Expungement Lawyer Expunged - Client with prior conviction for violent felony was ineligible for expungement through the courts. A successful 2-step reduction restored expungement eligibility and ultimately led to the court's decision to grant the requested expungement.
  • Utah Burglary Defense Attorney Not Guilty - Client was charged with second-degree felony residential burglary and facing potential prison time. Investigation by the defense revealed multiple witnesses, missed by police and prosecutors, who supported client's claim of innocence. At trial, the jury returned a "not guilty" verdict on all charges.
  • Recent Posts
  • What Constitutes Drug Parpahernalia in Utah How is drug paraphernalia defined in Utah? - The definition of drug paraphernalia under the Utah criminal code looks at both the nature of the object and also the intended use of the object in question. . . .
  • Utah Misdemeanor Attorney Salt Lake Can I handle a Utah misdemeanor from out-of-state? - Even if you do not intend to take your case to trial, a misdemeanor criminal offense in Utah can require multiple court appearances to reach a resolution. If you have been charged with a crime in Utah, but are not a Utah resident, an experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to help you resolve the case without returning to the state. . . .
Best Criminal Defense Strategy

You want the best defense. Agressive is good. But results ultimately are what really matter. Creating an effective strategy for defending against criminal prosecution requires a thorough understanding of statutes, case law, and evidentiary and procedural rules. A successful outcome is more likely when....

Strategy »
Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Profile Utah

Our criminal defense lawyers have represented clients facing some of the most serious felony charges on the books in Utah. Whether you are facing prosecution for felony or misdemeanor charges, you can be assured that our attorneys have the experience, knowledge, and determination necessary to help you achieve the results you need. Choosing the best defense attorney for your case will be one of the most important decisions you make....

Experience »
Conviction Consequences in Utah Criminal Prosecutions

Jail time, prison time, thousands of dollars in fines, and the lifetime collateral consequences of having a criminal conviction on your record - all of these and more are at stake when you are facing criminal prosecution in Utah. Understanding what is at risk is critical. Even so-called "minor" misdemeanor cases can have serious consequences....

Consequences »
Utah Criminal Defense Attorney - Reasons to Hope

Never give up hope. Being charged with a crime is not the same as being convicted. And it is usually not the end of the world. While the consequences of a criminal charge can be serious, there are often several options and strategies for handling your case. Understanding your options and how an experienced criminal lawyer can help....

Reasons to Hope »
Home | Attorney Profile | Case Results | Criminal Code | FAQ | Legal Resources | Defense Strategy | Contact Us

Serving Salt Lake, Davis, Weber, Utah, Cache, Tooele, Summit, Box Elder, and Wasatch Counties, and all of Utah.

Attorney Stephen Howard practices as part of the Canyons Law Group, LLC and Stephen W. Howard, PC.

Offices in Salt Lake and Davis Counties
560 South 300 East, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
952 S. Main St., Suite A, Layton, UT 84041

Call now to arrange for a confidential initial consultation with an experienced and effective Utah criminal defense lawyer.

In Salt Lake City, call 801-449-1409.
In Davis County, call 801-923-4345.

Stephen W. Howard, PC

The materials in this website are intended for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Viewing or responding to materials in this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Read Full Disclaimer.