Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Utah
Criminal Defense Attorney Stephen Howard
Call Criminal Defense Attorney in Utah
Call Utah Criminal Lawyer
Experienced Criminal Defense Attorneys / Former Prosecutors
Call 801-449-1409 now for help protecting your rights.
Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer Salt Lake City

Criminal Defense Solutions Start HereSM

Finding a Felony Defense LawyerChoosing a Misdemeanor Defense LawyerDrug and Alcohol Crimes Defense LawyerWhite Collar Defense Attorney for Utah ChargesAttorney for Expungements Reductions and PardonsDefendant Constitutional Rights Criminal LawyerBail and Bond Alternatives in UtahReasons for Hope Facing Criminal Charges

Protective Order Defense Attorney

Is a Utah protective order to "stay away" from certain locations unconstitutionally vague?

In some jurisdictions, it is standard practice for a protective order to state a specific distance which a respondent to the protective order must "stay away" from certain locations. For example, "the Respondent is ordered to stay at least 500 feet from Petitioner's [home, workplace, etc.]." But in Utah, it is common for a protective order to simply say "stay away from" certain premises, property, or locations. There is a degree of vagueness in an order to "stay away" that does not include a specific distance. In some cases, this provision of the order may be unconstitutionally vague and thus, unenforceable.

Criminal charges for violating a protective order can be filed at the felony or misdemeanor level, and penalties can be severe. If you are facing criminal prosecution for violation of a protective order in Utah, having an experienced criminal lawyer in your corner can give you the best chance of mounting a successful defense. Contact us today to see how we can help you.

Assessing Unconstitutional Vagueness

The idea that a statute or order may be unconstitutionally vague is based on constitutional requirements of due process. Due process requires that a person have "notice" of a law or order before the person can be punished for violating the law or order.

A statute or court order may be found to be unconstitutionally vague (or void for vagueness) if it is not sufficiently clear and explicit such that a person of ordinary intelligence can understand it and conform his or her conduct to the requirements of the statute or order. A court may determine that a law or order is unconstitutionally vague on its face or facially invalid when there is no set of circumstances under which the law or order could be enforced in a manner consistent with the requirements of due process. In other cases, a court may determine that a law or order is only unconstitutionally vague as it is applied to the specific facts and circumstances of the case at hand.

Challenging a Protective Order's "Stay Away" Provision

When challenging the constitutionality of a protective order's "stay away" provision for vagueness, the order may be challenged both facially and as-applied. Successful facial challenges are less common, as the challenger must demonstrate that the language of the order is so vague that there could be no set of circumstances under which the order could be constitutionally enforced. An as-applied challenge may have a better chance of success, but is going to depend heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of the case. Consider the two following hypothetical situations.

Assume a defendant who is charged with criminal violation of a protective order which states that he is required to "stay away from" the petitioner's residence. The basis for the charge is that the defendant was found sitting in the petitioner's front yard. It is unlikely that a court would be convinced that the language of the order is so vague that the defendant would not be on notice that his conduct was prohibited by the protective order.

By contrast, assume a second defendant who is charged with violating a protective order which states that she must "stay away from" the petitioner's place of employment. Assume that the basis for this charge is that the defendant was seen on State Street in downtown Salt Lake City, driving past the office tower where the petitioner has an office.

In both cases, the defendant was in close physical proximity to a prohibited place. But in the case involving the petitioner's front yard, confrontation or contact between petitioner and defendant is much more likely. And it is more likely that the defendant would be on notice that such conduct was prohibited by the protective order. By contrast, driving down a busy street in downtown Salt Lake City near an office tower is much less likely to result in any kind of interaction between the petitioner and the defendant. Further, without stating a specific distance, the "stay away" provision of the protective order is more likely to be found unconstitutionally vague as it is applied to the driving situation.

Finding a Criminal Defense Attorney

Utah Criminal Defense LawyerIf you are facing prosecution for violation of a protective order, domestic violence, or other criminal charges in Utah, it is vital that you consult with and obtain the assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney. The Utah criminal justice system is complex and the penalties can be severe. The right defense strategy and the right defense attorney can make all the difference.

Contact us today to see how we can help you.

Best Rating
Make a Payment to Your Account
Get Help Now
Name: Email: Phone: Describe your legal needs here:
I accept the disclaimer below.
Disclaimer: No attorney-client relationship is established by the use of this form. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be submitted through this form. By clicking 'submit' I am only requesting that I be contacted for the purpose of obtaining legal services.

This form protected by reCAPTCHA.

  • Selected Victories
  • Criminal Defense Trial AttorneyNot Guilty - Client was charged with aggravated assault for allegedly pointing handgun at and threatening another driver during a road rage incident. Defense investigation and analysis, combined with effective cross-examination at trial indicated the alleged victim was the initial aggressor and suported client's self-defense claim. Jury acquitted client at trial.
  • Minor Possession Alcohol - MIP AttorneyDismissed - Minor in possession charge (MIP) was dismissed by prosecutor when defense analysis demonstrated that the police had failed to obtain necessary evidence against client. Police had raided a large party involving underage drinking. Several individuals were charged, but police did not obtain evidence showing that client had personally consumed or possessed alcohol. Case was dismissed.
  • Utah Probation Attorney Released - Client absconded for more than 10 years from felony probation with Adult Probation and Parole. At an order to show cause hearing, prosecutor argued aggressively for prison. Based on effective mitigation efforts by the defense, the judge agreed to release client without further jail.
  • Felony Attorney Utah Dismissed - Client facing first-degree felony charge and possible life in prison for child kidnapping. Full defense analysis of the case revealed critical legal flaws in the prosecution's case. When confronted with the defense legal analysis, the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the case outright without trial.
  • Recent Posts
  • What to Do When Arrested for DUI What should I do if I am arrested for DUI? - Many DUI cases begin as minor traffic stops. But the consequences of a DUI conviction are much more serious than an ordinary traffic citation. If you are pulled over for a suspected DUI, you have specific important constitutional and statutory rights that can protect your. . . .
  • Utah Statewide Warrant Search How do I find out if I have an outstanding warrant? - If you believe you may have an outstanding arrest warrant in Utah, a criminal defense attorney can access the Utah statewide warrant system and help you find the best. . . .
Best Criminal Defense Strategy

You want the best defense. Agressive is good. But results ultimately are what really matter. Creating an effective strategy for defending against criminal prosecution requires a thorough understanding of statutes, case law, and evidentiary and procedural rules. A successful outcome is more likely when....

Strategy »
Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Profile Utah

Choosing the best criminal defense attorney for your Utah criminal case may be the single most important decision you make. The courtroom can be a hostile place. Prosecutors receive extensive training on legal and tactical issues. Having an experienced criminal defense lawyer on your side is critical to defending your case and protecting your rights....

Experience »
Conviction Consequences - Utah Criminal Defense

In Utah, even a "minor" misdemeanor conviction carries the potential for jail time and significant fines. A felony conviction carries the potential of lengthy prison terms and the various consequences that come with being labeled as a convicted felon. Never plead guilty without first finding out....

Consequences »
Utah Criminal Attorney - Reasons to Hope

An arrest is not a conviction. If you are facing criminal prosecution in Utah, it can feel like your world is collapsing. But there are things you can do right now that can increase your chances of a good outcome. An experienced criminal defense lawyer can help you evaluate the various options available to you and help develop a strategy for success....

Reasons to Hope »
Home | Attorney Profile | Case Results | Criminal Code | FAQ | Legal Resources | Defense Strategy | Contact Us

Serving Salt Lake, Davis, Weber, Utah, Cache, Tooele, Summit, Box Elder, and Wasatch Counties, and all of Utah.

Attorney Stephen Howard practices as part of the Canyons Law Group, LLC and Stephen W. Howard, PC.

Offices in Salt Lake and Davis Counties
560 South 300 East, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
952 S. Main St., Suite A, Layton, UT 84041

Call now to arrange for a confidential initial consultation with an experienced and effective Utah criminal defense lawyer.

In Salt Lake City, call 801-449-1409.
In Davis County, call 801-923-4345.

Stephen W. Howard, PC

The materials in this website are intended for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Viewing or responding to materials in this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Read Full Disclaimer.