Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Utah
Criminal Defense Attorney Stephen Howard
Call Criminal Defense Attorney in Utah
Call Utah Criminal Lawyer
Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyers / Former Prosecutors
Call 801-449-1409 now to see what the right attorney can do for you.
Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer Salt Lake City

Criminal Defense Solutions Start HereSM

Finding a Felony Defense LawyerChoosing a Misdemeanor Defense LawyerDrug and Alcohol Crimes Defense LawyerWhite Collar Defense Attorney for Utah ChargesAttorney for Expungements Reductions and PardonsDefendant Constitutional Rights Criminal LawyerBail and Bond Alternatives in UtahReasons for Hope Facing Criminal Charges

Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act - Criminal Defense Attorney

Challenging the Enhanced Penalties of the Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act for Unconstitutional Overbreadth

The term “cohabitant” as used in the Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act is defined in very broad terms. In the case of State v. Salt, 2015 UT App 72, the defendant challenged this statutory definition as being unconstitutionally overbroad.

If you are facing prosecution for domestic violence or other crimes, it is important to have the assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney. Contact us today to arrange for an initial consultation with Utah criminal lawyer Stephen Howard.

Unconstitutional Statutory Overbreadth

The Utah Court of Appeals has held that a statute is unconstitutionally overbroad where it criminalizes “both harmful and innocuous behavior.” Salt Lake City v. Lopez, 935 P.2d 1259 (Utah App. 1997). To succeed in challenging the overbreadth of a statute, a defendant must show that the statute “renders unlawful a substantial amount of constitutionally protected conduct.” Id. More specifically, Utah’s appellate courts have recognized the overbreadth doctrine only in the context of conduct that is protected under the First Amendment. Id.

Analysis by the Utah Court of Appeals

In State v. Salt, 2015 UT App 72, the defendant argued that the Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act violated his rights of free association under the First Amendment. Although the text of the First Amendment does not explicitly mention the right of “freedom of association,” courts have recognized that the right of free association is implicit in its language. The defendant argued that the statute criminalized otherwise innocent behavior, by punishing his prior choice to reside with the victim.

The court in Salt disagreed with the defendant’s analysis. The court reasoned that the Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act does not penalize a person’s choice to reside with another person, but instead only prohibits violent or otherwise criminal conduct against a cohabitant. The court noted that “violence and threats of violence” against a cohabitant are not the kind of “expression” that the First Amendment freedom of association is intended to protect.

The decision from the Court of Appeals in Salt is binding on district courts and justice courts in Utah. However, its reasoning and holding could  be overruled in the future by the Utah Supreme Court in a future appeal.

One concern that has been raised with the overbreadth analysis in the Salt decision is its focus on the criminalization of “violence” or “threats of violence.” It must be recognized that the criminalization of violent conduct is  nearly universal. But the Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act creates enhanced penalties that are not based on the degree or nature of the violent act committed, but can instead be based on the defendant’s prior associations with the victim. A successful overturning of the Salt decision would need to focus on the punishment imposed for the prior choice to associate with (by residing with) the victim.

Punishments already exist for violent offenses such as assault, criminal mischief, unlawful detention, kidnapping, etc. The severity of these penalties is based typically on the degree of injury inflicted, the value of damages done, the use of a weapon, the length of the detention, etc.

But the enhanced punishments under the Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act are based not on the nature or severity of the defendant’s conduct. Instead, the enhanced punishments can be based entirely on the defendant’s prior choice to associate with the victim in a domestic relationship.

Other information about potential constitutional challenges to the enhanced penalties under the Utah Cohabitant Abuse Act can be found on the following pages.

- Unconstitutional Vagueness
- Equal Protection Violations

Finding a Utah Criminal Defense Attorney for Domestic Violence

Salt Lake Criminal Defense LawyerA prosecution for domestic violence charges can result in serious consequences. If you are facing charges for a domestic violence offense or other crime, the assistance of an experienced criminal defense attorney can be vital. Contact us now for an initial confidential consultation with Utah criminal lawyer Stephen Howard.

Best Rating
Make a Payment to Your Account
Get Help Now
Name: Email: Phone: Describe your legal needs here:
I accept the disclaimer below.
Disclaimer: No attorney-client relationship is established by the use of this form. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be submitted through this form. By clicking 'submit' I am only requesting that I be contacted for the purpose of obtaining legal services.

This form protected by reCAPTCHA.

  • Selected Victories
  • Criminal Defense Trial AttorneyNot Guilty - Client was charged with aggravated assault for allegedly pointing handgun at and threatening another driver during a road rage incident. Defense investigation and analysis, combined with effective cross-examination at trial indicated the alleged victim was the initial aggressor and suported client's self-defense claim. Jury acquitted client at trial.
  • Minor Possession Alcohol - MIP AttorneyDismissed - Minor in possession charge (MIP) was dismissed by prosecutor when defense analysis demonstrated that the police had failed to obtain necessary evidence against client. Police had raided a large party involving underage drinking. Several individuals were charged, but police did not obtain evidence showing that client had personally consumed or possessed alcohol. Case was dismissed.
  • Utah Expungement Attorney Salt Lake Davis Expunged - Client with prior conviction for violent felony was ineligible for expungement through the courts. A successful 2-step reduction restored expungement eligibility and ultimately led to the court's decision to grant the requested expungement.
  • Violent Crimes Assalt Defense UtahProbation - Client charged with aggravated robbery based on allegations he entered a store with a gun and mask and demanded cash. Client confessed to police before hiring a defense attorney. Defense mitigation efforts resulted in a negotiated resolution that removed life in prison as a possibility, and secured a probation sentence from the court.
  • Recent Posts
  • What to Do When Arrested for DUI What should I do if I am arrested for DUI? - Many DUI cases begin as minor traffic stops. But the consequences of a DUI conviction are much more serious than an ordinary traffic citation. If you are pulled over for a suspected DUI, you have specific important constitutional and statutory rights that can protect your. . . .
  • Utah Misdemeanor Attorney Salt Lake Can I handle a Utah misdemeanor from out-of-state? - Even if you do not intend to take your case to trial, a misdemeanor criminal offense in Utah can require multiple court appearances to reach a resolution. If you have been charged with a crime in Utah, but are not a Utah resident, an experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to help you resolve the case without returning to the state. . . .
Best Utah Criminal Defense Strategy

The right criminal defense lawyer can work with you to develop a defense strategy designed to achieve the best results. Hiring a Utah criminal attorney with real courtroom experience and an in-depth understanding of the legal issues involved in defending against a criminal prosecution can help ensure the best...

Strategy »
Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Profile Utah

Choosing the best criminal defense attorney for your Utah criminal case may be the single most important decision you make. The courtroom can be a hostile place. Prosecutors receive extensive training on legal and tactical issues. Having an experienced criminal defense lawyer on your side is critical to defending your case and protecting your rights....

Experience »
Conviction Consequences - Utah Criminal Defense

A Utah criminal prosecution can result in a lifetime of consequences. Beyond jail and prison, a conviction can affect many areas of life, including employment, housing, finances, family, and much more. Never plead guilty without first consulting with an experienced criminal attorney. Understanding what is at stake is the first step....

Consequences »
Utah Criminal Defense Attorney - Hope

Facing criminal prosecution in Utah can feel like your world is collapsing. But there are reasons to remain hopeful, and there are things you can do right now that can help increase the odds of a successful outcome. An experienced criminal defense attorney can help you evaluate the various options you have, and can help you....

Reasons to Hope »
Home | Attorney Profile | Case Results | Criminal Code | FAQ | Legal Resources | Defense Strategy | Contact Us

Serving Salt Lake, Davis, Weber, Utah, Cache, Tooele, Summit, Box Elder, and Wasatch Counties, and all of Utah.

Attorney Stephen Howard practices as part of the Canyons Law Group, LLC and Stephen W. Howard, PC.

Offices in Salt Lake and Davis Counties
560 South 300 East, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
952 S. Main St., Suite A, Layton, UT 84041

Call now to arrange for a confidential initial consultation with an experienced and effective Utah criminal defense lawyer.

In Salt Lake City, call 801-449-1409.
In Davis County, call 801-923-4345.

Stephen W. Howard, PC

The materials in this website are intended for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Viewing or responding to materials in this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Read Full Disclaimer.