Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Utah
Criminal Defense Attorney Stephen Howard
Call Criminal Defense Attorney in Utah
Call Utah Criminal Lawyer
Experienced Criminal Defense Attorneys / Former Prosecutors
Call 801-449-1409 now for help protecting your rights.
Utah Criminal Defense Lawyer Salt Lake City

Criminal Defense Solutions Start HereSM

Finding a Felony Defense LawyerChoosing a Misdemeanor Defense LawyerDrug and Alcohol Crimes Defense LawyerWhite Collar Defense Attorney for Utah ChargesAttorney for Expungements Reductions and PardonsDefendant Constitutional Rights Criminal LawyerBail and Bond Alternatives in UtahReasons for Hope Facing Criminal Charges

Salt Lake Criminal Defense - Utah Criminal Lawyer

Utah Code 76-2-302 - Compulsion

Under Utah law, a defendant cannot be convicted of a crime for conduct committed by the defendant if the defendant acted under compulsion. In analyzing such a defense to a Utah criminal prosecution, it is important to consider the language of the statute defining the defense of compulsion. In order to successfully raise this defense, the statutory elements must be strictly met. Consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney is strongly encouraged.

Utah Compulsion Defense Defined

Utah Code 76-2-302(1) provides that a "person is not guilty of an offense when he engaged in the proscribed conduct because he was coerced to do so by the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force upon him or a third person, which force or threatened force a person of reasonable firmness in his situation would not have resisted."

This standard requires more than mere peer pressure. Instead, to mount a successful compulsion defense, a defendant must present evidence to support each specific element of the statutory compulsion defense. These elements are discussed below.

Unlawful Physical Force: A compulsion defense requires evidence that the defendant committed the criminal act as a result of a threat of unlawful physical force. Threats of legal action, threats to reveal embarrassing information, threats to withhold financial support, or other threats not involving physical force or violence are not sufficient to meet the statutory requirements of a Utah compulsion defense.

Imminent Threat: The threat of physical force must be imminent. It is not sufficient that a threat is made to use force at some time in the indefinite future. The threat must be relatively immediate.

Force Against Defendant or Third Person: On this requirement, the statute is somewhat generous. A person may raise a compulsion defense even if the threat is made against a third person. For example, a threat to kill the defendant's child may serve to support a compulsion defense just as would a threat to kill the defendant. The statutory compulsion defense does not specifically distinguish between a threat made against the defendant and a threat made against a third person.

A Utah Compulsion Defense Exception

The defense of compulsion is not available to a criminal defendant in Utah if the evidence shows that the defendant "intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly" put himself in a situation where it is "probably that he will be subjected to duress." Consider the following hypothetical scenario:

Albert agrees with Bob to help rob a bank. The two enter the bank, Bob raises a gun in the air, and shouts, "Everybody get down on the floor." Bob then orders Albert to start tying up the tellers. At this point, Albert gets cold feet and tells Bob that he only signed up for a robbery, and doesn't want to participate in anything that could be seen as kidnapping. Bob threatens Albert, telling him that if he doesn't start tying up the tellers, Bob will start shooting hostages. Under this threatened use of unlawful force against the third-party hostages, Albert agrees to tie up the tellers.

In this scenario, Albert is in fact acting under the threatened use of unlawful force against third persons. Further, the nature of the threat is such that a person of reasonable firmness would likely have complied with Bob's demands. But even though these elements of a compulsion defense may be met, Albert cannot benefit from the compulsion defense with regard to a kidnapping charge if the jury believes that by agreeing to participate in the robbery, Albert put himself in a situation where it was "probable that he would be subjected to duress."

Common Law Compulsion Presumption Eliminated

Utah's law on the affirmative defense of compulsion specifically provides that a married woman is not, merely by reason of the presence of her husband at the time she commits a crime, to any presumption of compulsion or to any defense of compulsion. For a married woman to raise the defense of compulsion, a married woman must meet all of the ordinary elements of a compulsion defense.

Standing alone, this statutory language may seem strange and unnecessary, since the Utah criminal code generally treats all people equally, male and female, married and unmarried. To be properly understood, one must look at the old English common law regarding compulsion as it applied to married women.

Under the common law, a woman's actions taken in the presence of her husband could be presumed to have been taken under his dominion and will. Thus, the wife could be exempted from criminal punishment based on this presumed coercion. This common law defense of compulsion for a married woman was in turn based on long-since outdated and abandoned principles regarding marriage, property, and other rights of women.

While not specifically referencing the common law, the Utah criminal compulsion statute makes clear that this old common law presumption is no longer valid under Utah law.

Finding a Utah Criminal Defense Attorney in Salt Lake City

Salt Lake Defense AttorneyIf you are facing criminal charges, a good criminal attorney can be critical to developing a successful defense strategy. If you are contemplating raising the defense of compulsion, it is even more important to have an experienced criminal defense lawyer on your side.

Based in Salt Lake City, criminal defense attorney Stephen Howard has defended thousands of felony and misdemeanor cases during his career. He has achieved not guilty verdicts and dismissals for some of the most serious criminal charges on the books in Utah.

Contact us today to arrange for a confidential consultation.

Utah Code 76-2-101 - Mens Rea Requirements
Utah Code 76-2-303 - Entrapment as an Affirmative Defense
More Utah Criminal Code Provisions

Best Rating
Make a Payment to Your Account
Get Help Now
Name: Email: Phone: Describe your legal needs here:
I accept the disclaimer below.
Disclaimer: No attorney-client relationship is established by the use of this form. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be submitted through this form. By clicking 'submit' I am only requesting that I be contacted for the purpose of obtaining legal services.

This form protected by reCAPTCHA.

  • Selected Victories
  • Criminal Defense Trial AttorneyNot Guilty - Client was charged with aggravated assault for allegedly pointing handgun at and threatening another driver during a road rage incident. Defense investigation and analysis, combined with effective cross-examination at trial indicated the alleged victim was the initial aggressor and suported client's self-defense claim. Jury acquitted client at trial.
  • Drug Crimes Defense Attorney Utah Dismissed - Client was facing multiple cases involving first-degree felony drug distribution charges for allegedly selling to a confidential informant. Defense analysis of the case revealed fatal flaws in the prosecution case that ultimately resulted in a complete dismissal of all cases and charges.
  • 402 Reduction Lawyer Utah 2-Step Reduction - Client needed a two-step reduction to bring a prior conviction to the misdemeanor level. Collection of substantial evidence of reform and rehabilitation convinced a normally reluctant prosecutor to stipulate to the defense 402 reduction motion.
  • Violent Crimes Assalt Defense UtahDismissed at Preliminary Hearing - Client charged with aggravated robbery and facing life in prison. Full case analysis and consultation with client allowed the development of a strong defense strategy. Effective cross-examination of the alleged victim at the preliminary hearing resulted in an outright dismissal of all charges by the judge.
  • Recent Posts
  • What Constitutes Drug Parpahernalia in Utah How is drug paraphernalia defined in Utah? - The definition of drug paraphernalia under the Utah criminal code looks at both the nature of the object and also the intended use of the object in question. . . .
  • Utah Misdemeanor Attorney Salt Lake Can I handle a Utah misdemeanor from out-of-state? - Even if you do not intend to take your case to trial, a misdemeanor criminal offense in Utah can require multiple court appearances to reach a resolution. If you have been charged with a crime in Utah, but are not a Utah resident, an experienced criminal defense attorney may be able to help you resolve the case without returning to the state. . . .
Best Criminal Defense Strategy

The best outcome is more likely when the right strategy is employed. Developing the best strategy can require real courtroom experience, a thorough understanding of procedural and substantive legal issues, and a determination to ensure that important constitutional and other legal rights are protected. Choosing the right attorney....

Strategy »
Salt Lake Criminal Defense Attorney Profile Utah

With decades of combined experience, our criminal defense team attorneys have the knowledge, skill, and determination to help you achieve the results you need. Facing criminal prosecution in Utah can have serious consequences. Choosing the best attorney to defend your case may be one of the most important decisions you will ever make....

Experience »
Conviction Consequences - Utah Criminal Defense

Even a "minor" misdemeanor carries the potential for jail time and significant fines. The direct penalties and collateral consequences of a felony conviction are even more severe. Understanding these consequences is critical as you make decisions relating to your case. Even in a misdemeanor case, you should not....

Consequences »
Utah Criminal Defense Attorney - Reasons to Hope

Being charged with a crime is not the same as being convicted. But just being charged can affect more than you may have imagined - jail, job, family, bills, rent or mortgage. It can feel like everything has gone wrong, and may you wonder if anything can go right. But facing criminal prosecution does not mean giving up hope....

Reasons to Hope »
Home | Attorney Profile | Case Results | Criminal Code | FAQ | Legal Resources | Defense Strategy | Contact Us

Serving Salt Lake, Davis, Weber, Utah, Cache, Tooele, Summit, Box Elder, and Wasatch Counties, and all of Utah.

Attorney Stephen Howard practices as part of the Canyons Law Group, LLC and Stephen W. Howard, PC.

Offices in Salt Lake and Davis Counties
560 South 300 East, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
952 S. Main St., Suite A, Layton, UT 84041

Call now to arrange for a confidential initial consultation with an experienced and effective Utah criminal defense lawyer.

In Salt Lake City, call 801-449-1409.
In Davis County, call 801-923-4345.

Stephen W. Howard, PC

The materials in this website are intended for informational purposes only, and are not legal advice. Viewing or responding to materials in this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Read Full Disclaimer.