The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees each person the privilege against self incrimination. This privilege (sometimes referred to as the โright to remain silentโ) can be one of the most important rights in Utah criminal cases. This privilege applies both during the investigation stage of the case and at trial. A violation of these rights can form the basis of a motion to suppress evidence, and may in some cases result in a complete dismissal of charges.
The Right to Remain Silent
On television, when a person is arrested, the police read the Miranda warnings. โYou have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you. . . .โ Decades of police television shows have created a common belief that police are required to read the Miranda warnings immediately upon arrest, and that failure to do so can mean that the case must be dismissed.

The best defense attorneys challenge the status quo through ethical advocacy both in and out of the courtroom.
The Miranda warnings are real. But they donโt always work the way television portrays them.
The Fifth Amendment guarantees the privilege against self-incrimination. That means that police cannot force you to talk to them, and a judge canโt force you to testify in your own criminal case. In order to protect those rights, the United States Supreme Court has set forth the Miranda warnings, which must be given anytime police are going to interrogate or question a person who is in custody.
It sounds simple enough, but it gets complicated very quickly. There is a substantial body of case law that has developed just around the question of whether a person is in custody. Is being handcuffed enough? What about being handcuffed in a police car? When exactly is the person taken into โcustody.โ Is it when the officer forms the intent to take the person into custody? Or is it when the person being arrested realizes that he is under arrest?
A good attorney will talk with you about how your case can affect your job, education, family, and future.

There are also gray areas relating to the issue of what constitutes โquestioningโ by police? What about a person who invokes their Miranda rights, and later starts to talk to police. After a person invokes their Miranda rights, can the police come back later and ask if he has changed his mind? These are just a few examples of questions that have been hotly debated and argued in the courts over exactly how much protection the Fifth Amendment gives.
Miranda Warnings and Motions to Suppress
A violation of a defendantโs Fifth Amendment rights does not automatically guarantee a dismissal of the criminal case. In evaluating how a Miranda violation may affect the case, it is critical to consider what evidence the police obtained as a result of that violation. Both the incriminating statements made by the defendant as well as other evidence obtained based on those statements (the โfruit of the poisonous treeโ) can be suppressed if a court determines that the statements and other evidence were the result of constitutional violations committed by police.
In order to put this issue before the court for consideration, an appropriate motion to suppress must be filed. When a suppression motion is filed, the court will typically schedule an evidentiary hearing where each side (the prosecution and the defense) may present testimony, witnesses, or other evidence showing whether or not the police committed a violation of the defendantโs Fifth Amendment Rights.

A successful defense strategy starts with an understanding of your goals and needs.
Following the evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress, the court will allow each side to present legal arguments in support of its position. These arguments may be made orally in court, or the judge may allow each side an opportunity to formally brief the issues (present written arguments on the issues).
If the court determines that police did in fact violate the defendantโs Fifth Amendment rights, the court must then determine what evidence should be suppressed. If the suppressed evidence is critical to the prosecutorโs case, then the prosecutor may choose to dismiss the entire case. If the prosecutor believes that there is still sufficient evidence to support the charges, without considering the suppressed evidence, then the prosecutor may choose to go forward with the case.
Utahโs Constitution and the Right to Remain Silent
Article I Section 12 of the Utah Constitution provides that the accused (the defendant) โshall not be compelled to give evidence against himself.โ This right has generally been interpreted as being consistent with the United States Constitutionโs Fifth Amendment.
The best attorneys know how to fight, what to fight, and when to fight.

Finding the Right Criminal Attorney
If you are facing Utah criminal charges, you should consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney to determine whether your Fifth Amendment rights have been violated.
Contact us now to see the difference the right attorney can make in your case.